critical thinking exercise -compare-

Compare ideas with mine and group's, I found that all of us were thinking to left next generation and how to improve the situation for the nextgeneration. I also felt that the way of thinking is different with female and male. It could be seen on the choice whether one choose "pregnant" or not. This is very interesting for me.

critical thinking exercise

Above all thing, I decide select criterion. First, sexuality balance, it is the most important thinking about next generation. So, man and female ratio is 3:3. Second, youth is better. Required skills for survivors who rebuild a new society are skill to enhance survival rate, to build a construction and to teach next generations to oneself knowledge. Skill to enhance survival rate means medical knowledge. Skill to build a construction means carpenter’s skill. Then, I select 1, 4, 7, 10, 11, and 12, they have the required skills. 1, 4, 7, 11 have skill to enhance survival rate. 10, 12 have skill to build a construction and all of them have skill to teach next generations to oneself knowledge. Some of them have a negative aspect but, their skill is essential and that negative aspect is insignificant problem.

Our group selection and my selection is the same. So, I have nothing to write anymore.

i'm so tired of being proposed marriage by plenty of cats

Critical Thinking -Group-
We selected 1, 4, 7, 10, 11, and 12. First, we decided the ratio of male to female and age, because it is important to suppose next generation. We thought 3 males and 3 females is the best for next generations. We selected people by their skills, and this is why we selected these people. 1 is physician, it is important, because everyone need physician in the life. It is self-evidence. 4 is biochemist, biochemist is needed by physician for medicine. 7 is medical student. He is inexperience, but 1 is old, so we thought he can be replacement after 1 gets retired. 11 is nurse, she is needed by 1 and 7. 7and 11 is sexual minority, so they can be good partner.10 and 12 is needed when something is broken. And 12 is so young, he accede to 10’s skill.

Critical Thinking-Solo-
I selected 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 10. I thought it is best that the ratio of male to female is equal. And medically skill is needed for their life. So 1, 3, 4, and 7 have medically skill, and their skill is multipronged. Thus I thought they can help each other. 2 is drill instructor, so she can train next generation. I thought next generation must be wholesomeness. 10 have bad point, but his skill is so precious that 12 cannot conquer.


Comparing my idea with the group idea, group idea emphasizes point of age. My idea and the group idea suppose next generation. But the group thinks age is more important than sexual propensity, because gay and lesbian can be straight in the crucial situation. I don’t think so. And the group thinks people need the coeval person for the stabilization of mind. Each idea is coincident with the thought of the ratio of male to female. Same number of male and female is good for making next generations.

critical thinking exercise -group-

Our group chose whose number 1, 4, 7, 10, 11, and 12. The criterion for judgment is what ability they have and if they can make next generation. Firstly, all of us chose 1 and 10, because of 1 is a physician and 10 is a skillful carpenter. There should be in need a physician in case someone is sick and a carpenter for in case repair or re-built the shelter. Secondly, we realized that physicians need medicines, so the number 4 is eligible because she is a biochemist who may have an ability to prepare for medicines. Thirdly, we chose number 12 because we think that it would be better to train someone for the next generation. Then 12 will be a 10’s pupil. Finally, we chose 7 and 11 in spite of they are homosexual. There is a risk which they fall in love with people whose sex are same, but at the same time, there is a high opportunity that they fall in love with people whose sex are different because the situation is so extreme. This is our choice.

critical thinking exercise

I chose the people whose number 1, 2, 8, 9,10and12. I chose them who have abilities which in needed at the small world; in the shelter. In the shelter, there need who can make discipline, doctor, who can make people relieve and who can rebuilt or fix the shelter, at least. So, 1, 2, 9 and10 are who must be there and eligible. I want 8 to survive because she is pregnant, and I think someone should by her side then I chose 12 because of he is the nearest age with her.

I choosed No,　１，３,4, 7, 8,10,and 11. I exluded others with reasons. No 2 is that I can not imagine that drill help us to survive. No. 4 is the Biochemist, so I choosed the researcher that No4. I think we can research in all situation but chemist can not work without laboratory. No.5 is that he must have like and dislikes in diet because he is the athlete. No. 6 is that most of starlets are too selfish to look after.No 9 is that Catholic hate gay and lesbian so I excluded him. No. 12 is that first year apprentice carpenter is less valuable than Mr fix it man.

Paragraph by paragraph plan of my essay

ⅠIntroduction
　Focus a social paradigm sift after WW2 and current situation generated by social paradigm.

ⅡResearch a social issues Japanese youth faced
Research a social issues Japanese youth faced represented by NEET, Hikikomori, Working-poor.

ⅢResearch a current social paradigm Surrounding Japanese youth
The social issues are (at least in essay) due to the social structure. So, I research why social structure arrived at (or developed into, or generated) the current system.

ⅣMy view to these situations
I do not deplore these situations but suggest constructive method to break the status quo.

ⅤConclusion