i'm so tired of being proposed marriage by plenty of cats

Critical Thinking -Group-
We selected 1, 4, 7, 10, 11, and 12. First, we decided the ratio of male to female and age, because it is important to suppose next generation. We thought 3 males and 3 females is the best for next generations. We selected people by their skills, and this is why we selected these people. 1 is physician, it is important, because everyone need physician in the life. It is self-evidence. 4 is biochemist, biochemist is needed by physician for medicine. 7 is medical student. He is inexperience, but 1 is old, so we thought he can be replacement after 1 gets retired. 11 is nurse, she is needed by 1 and 7. 7and 11 is sexual minority, so they can be good partner.10 and 12 is needed when something is broken. And 12 is so young, he accede to 10’s skill.

Critical Thinking-Solo-
I selected 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 10. I thought it is best that the ratio of male to female is equal. And medically skill is needed for their life. So 1, 3, 4, and 7 have medically skill, and their skill is multipronged. Thus I thought they can help each other. 2 is drill instructor, so she can train next generation. I thought next generation must be wholesomeness. 10 have bad point, but his skill is so precious that 12 cannot conquer.


Comparing my idea with the group idea, group idea emphasizes point of age. My idea and the group idea suppose next generation. But the group thinks age is more important than sexual propensity, because gay and lesbian can be straight in the crucial situation. I don’t think so. And the group thinks people need the coeval person for the stabilization of mind. Each idea is coincident with the thought of the ratio of male to female. Same number of male and female is good for making next generations.